Rights issues, and the cost of doing nothing

A rights issue asks you for money

A rights issue is a company raising fresh money from the people who already own it. Every existing holder is offered new shares in proportion to what they already hold, at a price the company sets, and each holder can take the offer up, sell it, or let it go.

The proportion is what makes it even-handed, and it is worth seeing why. If the offer is one new share for every four held, a holder with 400 shares is offered 100 and a holder with 40 is offered 10. Everyone who takes it up in full ends the exercise owning the same fraction of a larger company.

Which tells you what happens to a holder who does not. New shares go to everyone else, the share count rises, and the holder who put in no money owns a smaller piece of the business than they did the week before — they have been diluted. That word carries most of this article, and the arithmetic under it is worth doing rather than accepting.

A rights issue is one of the four events covered in corporate actions, and it is the odd one out. A split and a bonus happen to you and ask nothing. A buyback asks a question, and a holder who declines it is left owning a larger fraction, not a smaller one. A rights issue is the only one where silence costs something — and the amount can be worked out to the rupee on the day it is announced.

The ex-rights price, worked slowly

Follow one holding and every rupee attached to it. You hold 100 shares trading at ₹180, so ₹18,000. The company announces a rights issue of one new share for every four held, at ₹80 a share.

Your entitlement is 25 new shares, costing ₹2,000. Take it up and you hold 125 shares. The company now has ₹2,000 it did not have before, so the pot backing your holding is ₹18,000 plus ₹2,000, spread across 125 shares. That is ₹160 a share.

₹160 is what the arithmetic alone says the share is worth afterwards: what you held, plus what you paid in, divided by what you now hold. The term arrives last, as it should — that is the theoretical ex-rights price, the reference the share is priced from once it trades without the entitlement attached. The first word matters. ₹160 is where the arithmetic says the price resets to and not a level it has to reach — buyers and sellers settle where it actually trades that morning, as on any other.

Now check whether you gained anything. You paid ₹80 for a share worth ₹160, which is ₹80 of apparent profit on each of 25 shares, or ₹2,000 in total.

Set against that, the 100 shares you already held fell from ₹180 to ₹160. That is ₹20 a share across 100 shares, which is also ₹2,000. The two figures are the same number because you handed over ₹2,000 of your own money and received ₹2,000 of company in exchange.

The figure that does move is the size of the company. Price multiplied by the number of shares is market capitalisation, and here it rises by exactly the cash raised and not a rupee more. A rights issue is the one corporate action where the company gets bigger because you made it bigger.

Three answers, and one of them is not an answer

So far the arithmetic says a rights issue does nothing for you, which is true only of the holder who takes it up. There are three ways to answer the letter — pay, sell, or ignore — plus a blend of the first two, and they do not all land in the same place.

Keep the running numbers: 100 shares, an entitlement to 25 new shares at ₹80, and a theoretical ex-rights price of ₹160.

Read the last column down. Every row but the last leaves you exactly where you started, which is the practical content of the whole subject.

The entitlement is worth ₹80 for a reason that fits in one line: it is the right to pay ₹80 for something that will be worth ₹160. Twenty-five of them come to ₹2,000, which is precisely what the holder who does nothing loses. Not a coincidence — the same value, either collected or abandoned.

And the money is only half of it. Everyone who subscribed now holds 125 shares for every 100 they had; the holder who did nothing still holds 100. Their share of the company has fallen to four-fifths of what it was, with no transaction of theirs anywhere in the record.

Why a deeper discount is a bigger penalty, not a bigger gift

The discount is usually the first thing an announcement is read for. Shares offered at ₹80 when the market price is ₹180 reads as more than half off, and it reads like generosity. It is neither generous nor, in any useful sense, a discount. It is a dial the company sets, and turning it does something specific that is not in the announcement.

Hold the amount raised constant and move only the issue price. The company wants ₹2,000 from a holder of 100 shares either way.

At ₹80 a share it must issue 25 new shares, one for every four held. That case is already worked: the ex-rights price is ₹160, the entitlement is worth ₹2,000 in total, and a holder who ignores it ends with ₹16,000 instead of ₹18,000.

At ₹20 a share it must issue 100 new shares, one for one. The pot is the same ₹20,000 and it is now spread across 200 shares, so the ex-rights price is ₹100. Each entitlement is worth ₹80 again, but there are a hundred of them — ₹8,000. A holder who ignores this one ends with ₹10,000, a shortfall of ₹8,000 on a holding that was ₹18,000.

Same company, same money raised, same holder, and every participant ends in exactly the same place under both offers. What changed is that one version costs an inattentive holder ₹2,000 and the other costs them ₹8,000. The discount did not alter what anyone received. It altered the penalty for inattention, by a factor of four.

That is the single most useful thing to know about the size of a rights discount. It measures how far the issue price sits below the market, and therefore how much of a holding's value has been moved out of the shares and into an entitlement that expires. A deeply discounted issue is not a better deal. It is a more urgent one.

Why price so far below the market at all? The conventional reading is that the discount buys certainty — the offer stays worth taking even if the share price falls between the announcement and the closing date, so the money is more likely to arrive in full. That is a reading about the company's need, not a statement about value, and nothing in the mechanics establishes it.

The entitlement is a thing you own, and it expires

Selling the entitlement only works if there is somewhere to sell it, and in India two separate pieces of plumbing make that possible. The depository credits the entitlement to your demat account as its own line, held apart from the shares; the exchanges then provide a window during which that line can be sold to someone else.

Three consequences follow, and none of them is intuitive.

• A short trading window — the entitlement is sellable only until a stated date, and that date falls before the last date to subscribe. Miss it and the remaining choices are to pay or to lapse.
• A price of its own — the entitlement trades on its own supply and demand. Its computed value is ₹80 in the example above; what it actually fetches is whatever a buyer will pay in a thin market over a few days, which is often less.
• A buyer's obligation — whoever buys an entitlement has bought the right to subscribe, not the shares. They must still pay the issue price by the deadline. An entitlement bought and forgotten expires exactly as one received and forgotten does.

The lapse is the part to sit with, because it has no analogue elsewhere in a portfolio. An unexercised, unsold entitlement is not carried forward, not paid out as cash and not compensated. It stops existing, and the value it represented has already moved into shares that other people bought.

The blend in the third row of the table is what the entitlement's tradability buys a holder who wants to stay whole without finding new cash: sell part of it and use the proceeds to take up the rest. In the running example, selling 13 entitlements at ₹80 raises ₹1,040 and taking up 12 costs ₹960 — near enough cash-neutral, ending with 112 shares.

The arithmetic generalises rather than depending on these numbers. The fraction of an entitlement that can be funded by selling the rest is the entitlement's value divided by the sum of the issue price and that value. Here ₹80 divided by ₹160 is a half, so half the entitlement can be taken up for nothing. A deeper discount raises that fraction, which is the one respect in which a deep discount genuinely helps a holder who is short of cash.

Four dates, in order, and the one to diarise

Entitlement goes to whoever is on the register on the record date, and the share begins trading without it from the ex-date. Those two work exactly as they do for every other corporate action — a purchase made on or after the ex-date does not carry the entitlement — so this article does not restate the mechanism.

What is particular to a rights issue is that the record date starts a process instead of ending one. Four dates matter and they run in order: the record date fixes who is entitled, the issue opens, the entitlement stops trading, and the issue closes.

The gap between the third and the fourth is where the choice quietly narrows. Until the entitlement stops trading there are three live options; afterwards there are two, and one of them is to lose the value. Diarise the entitlement's last trading day, not the closing date — the closing date is printed largest and it is the one by which the decision has already been made smaller.

One more thing to settle before either selling an entitlement or selling the shares afterwards. What the tax computation treats as the cost of rights shares, and how the proceeds of a sold entitlement are treated, are set by the Income-tax Act rather than by the company — and neither is the same question as the tax on an ordinary sale.

The question the arithmetic cannot answer

Everything above is bookkeeping. It settles what happens to a holding mechanically and says nothing about whether the company should be given more money, which is the question that matters most and the one no ex-rights calculation can reach.

What is on the record is the stated use of the proceeds, which the offer document sets out. The conventional reading distinguishes money raised because an opportunity needs funding from money raised because a balance sheet needs repairing, and treats the first as the stronger position. Both are legitimate, both produce documents that look alike, and that reading is a judgement about the business rather than anything the mechanics establish — the arithmetic of a rights issue is identical in either case.

Two features separate a rights issue from a first-time listing, and both are worth holding on to. It can happen again — nothing stops a company that has raised this way once from doing it a second and a third time, so a holder intending to stay whole is committing to fund every future round in proportion or be diluted at each one.

And it needs no new buyer. The money comes from people who have already decided to own the shares, which is why a rights issue can be completed in conditions where a public issue would struggle. That is a genuine structural advantage for the company. Whether it is one for the holder depends entirely on what the money is for.

Reading a price history that has been through one

A rights issue leaves the same footprint in a price series that a split or a bonus does, and it is the one most often missed.

On the ex-rights date the quoted price steps down from ₹180 towards ₹160 in the running example, and nothing happened to the business that morning. An unadjusted series records that step as a fall of roughly 11%, and every figure computed across it — a return, a moving average, a drawdown, a volatility estimate — inherits the error. The step is in the data, not in the company.

The adjustment a rights issue needs is smaller than the one a split or a bonus needs, which is exactly why it survives unnoticed. A one-for-one bonus halves the series and anyone glancing at the chart would query it; an 11% step looks like an ordinary bad day. The check is the same either way: find a date on which the company is known to have gone ex-rights, and look at the series across it.

FNOTrader's Market Pulse scanner charts NSE and BSE price history alongside breadth and relative-strength measures, and the same check applies to it as to any other source. Nothing in it, and nothing here, says whether a company asking for more money deserves it. The arithmetic settles the narrower question only — what the offer does to a holding, and what declining it costs.

Common questions

Continue reading

More in Investing Basics · App: Market Pulse Stocks Scanner · Definitions: glossary · Free tools: calculators · All: every article