Savings or current?

The trade each one makes

A bank uses your deposit to lend. What it pays you depends on how predictable that deposit is.

Money that mostly sits still is useful to a bank — it can be lent out with confidence. Money that churns constantly is not, because the bank must keep it available. So the account designed for stillness pays interest and restricts activity, and the account designed for churn permits unlimited activity and pays nothing.

The interest forgone on a current account is the fee for unlimited transactions. It is simply charged by omission rather than by debit, which is why it goes unnoticed.

Which one you need

For nearly every individual, the answer is a savings account. A current account makes sense when transaction volume would breach a savings account's free limits, when an overdraft facility matters, or when a business needs to keep its money separate from personal money — which it should, for reasons that are as much about record-keeping as about banking.

The mistake worth naming: a freelancer or small proprietor holding business receipts in a personal savings account. It works until transaction volume triggers charges, and it makes reconciliation and tax filing considerably harder than it needs to be.

The account that resolves the tension

A savings account pays little. A fixed deposit pays more but locks the money. Most households want both, for the same rupees.

A sweep-in or auto-sweep account does this automatically. Balances above a threshold you set are moved into a linked deposit, earning the deposit rate. If a withdrawal takes the account below the threshold, exactly as much as is needed is broken out of the deposit and returned — usually on a last-in-first-out basis so the newest, least-matured slice is broken first.

From the outside it behaves like an ordinary savings account with a better rate. This makes it a strong default for the liquid tranche of an emergency fund: deposit-level returns with same-day access and no decision to make.

Two things to check before assuming it is free money. The threshold and sweep increment are set by the bank and determine how much actually earns the higher rate. And breaking a slice early means that slice earns the rate applicable to the period held — the loss is small, and it is not zero.

Why the interest rate matters less than it looks

Savings rates in India are deregulated, so banks compete on them, and some offer materially more than others.

It is still the wrong thing to optimise hard, for a reason worth stating in numbers. Interest is computed on the daily balance, so it applies to whatever is actually sitting there — which for most households is a modest working balance, not a corpus. A percentage point of difference on a month's expenses is a small annual sum, and chasing it into a bank with worse service, a poorer app or a less convenient branch network is a bad trade.

Where the rate genuinely matters is on larger idle balances, and the correct response there is usually not a higher-paying savings account. It is to stop holding a large idle balance — sweep it, or move it somewhere matched to when it is needed.

The charges that actually cost people money

• Minimum balance shortfall. The most common avoidable charge in Indian retail banking, levied monthly, and it can exceed a year of interest on the same balance.
• Transactions beyond the free count — ATM withdrawals outside your own bank's network, and cash deposits or withdrawals above a monthly limit.
• Debit card annual fee, often charged silently on renewal.
• SMS alert charges, small and quarterly and permanent.
• Cheque return charges, on both sides of a bounced cheque.

None is large individually. Together they routinely exceed the interest the account pays, which makes the effective return on a poorly-matched savings account negative. The schedule of charges is published; reading it once is worth more than comparing interest rates.

What protects the money

Deposits in Indian banks are insured by DICGC, up to a limit applying per depositor per bank, covering savings, current, fixed and recurring deposits together. The limit is set by regulation and has been revised, so verify the current figure rather than assuming.

Two practical consequences. Balances above the limit at one bank are not covered, so very large holdings are safer spread across banks than concentrated. And the cover is per bank, not per account — opening three accounts at the same bank does not triple it.

This is the one genuine safety advantage a bank deposit has over almost every alternative, and it is worth knowing precisely rather than approximately.

The five minutes most people skip

Add a nominee to every account, and keep it current.

Without one, releasing a balance to a family member becomes a legal process requiring documentation, at a moment when the family is least able to deal with it. With one, it is largely administrative.

Nomination is free, takes minutes, and can be updated whenever circumstances change — and it is the single highest-value banking action relative to effort. It belongs on the same list as knowing where the policies are.

Where the balance should not sit

A savings account is the right place for a working balance and the wrong place for a corpus, because its rate rarely keeps pace with inflation — making a large idle balance a slow, certain loss of purchasing power.

Money with a horizon attached belongs somewhere matched to that horizon. FNOTrader's Mutual Funds app carries the full AMFI NAV history — around 34 million NAV rows — so how a low-duration option has actually behaved, including its worst drawdown, is inspectable before anything is moved.

Common questions

Continue reading

More in Banking · App: Mutual Funds · Definitions: glossary · Free tools: calculators · All: every article